Keeping NAPLAN in perspective

I was very interested, and pleased, to receive the following email message from Judy Anderson, President of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers today regarding the recent release of NAPLAN  results:

TO: All AAMT members and interested others

 

Dear colleague

 

You will be aware from the media and in your school that NAPLAN (National Assessment Program in Literacy and Numeracy) results are now being distributed to parents. The release of the summary report has resulted in a range of comments in the media. Interpreting the data for parents and at the class and school levels is likely to be on the agenda for many members of AAMT. I write to remind you of the AAMT’s position on the matter: these comments refer to the ‘Position Paper on the Practice of Assessing Mathematics Learning’ and may be useful to you in the conversations about the NAPLAN results that are likely to be occurring all over the country. The Position Paper can be downloaded from http://www.aamt.edu.au/Documentation/Statements

 

One of the main issues is the use of NAPLAN data. The Position paper makes some clear statements about this. It states that Education authorities’

assessment should:

 

€ ‘make claims that can be related directly to what is assessed’:

the format of NAPLAN tests limits what they are able to assess.

 

€ ‘prohibit the publication of league tables of schools from their data’:

league tables and similar coarse comparisons of schools’ performances are not helpful to teachers and the teaching and learning of mathematics.

 

€ ‘provide information that maximises opportunities for teachers to capitalise, in their teaching, on the assessment information gathered’:

it is more than just providing the data — education authorities need to support teachers and schools to analyse NAPLAN results to diagnose students’

strengths and weaknesses. (p. 7)

 

There is no doubt that the NAPLAN results can provide diagnostic information about your students so I encourage you to seek out that information and use it to inform your teaching. However, the Position Paper argues for ‘appropriate assessment’ by stating that teachers should:

 

€ ‘assess the full range of learning goals by using a range of strategies’:

NAPLAN tests are only one component of a comprehensive approach to assessment in mathematics. (p. 3)

 

Education authorities and schools need to further support the development of quality assessment in mathematics.

 

The release of the NAPLAN results is a single event in this whole year of teaching mathematics. I hope that you are able to be involved in productive thinking and conversations about the process and the data as part of what we all recognise as the ‘main game’ — high quality teaching, learning and assessment in mathematics for all our young people.

Advertisements

About Linda

I have been involved in secondary mathematics education in Victoria, Australia for over 25 years.
This entry was posted in Assessment, Students, Systems, The profession. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Keeping NAPLAN in perspective

  1. Bill Healy says:

    For the benefit of teachers, the detailed answers to the May 2009 NAPLAN tests are available in Word, pdf and Data Projector formats. Go to
    http://kilbaha.googlepages.com/NAPLAN_answers.pdf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s