AAMT gets political on assessment

The AAMT (Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers) released their position paper on The Practice of Assessing Mathematics Learning late in 2008. The paper describes practice teachers should endeavour to work towards, in mathematics assessment. It is based around three themes. Students’ learning of mathematics should be assessed in ways that
• are appropriate
• are fair and inclusive
• inform learning and action
Under each of these themes, the paper outlines expectations for teachers and, more interestingly, for assessment programs of education authorities. The latter, I believe, is the first public inclusion, of which I am aware, of advice to government bodies from a subject association. This advice includes statements such as:

Large scale assessment programs are expensive. Funds applied to these should be proportional to the benefits from the program to students, teachers, parents, schools and the education authorities themselves. Excessive public expenditure on assessment programs cannot be justified in the context of limited overall funding for education.

It is well worth a careful reading…more than this, it deserves a careful reading, an open-minded reflection on current assessment practices and then a thorough audit of these practices, leading to change if appropriate. It is also of value to other disciplines and is available here.

Whilst I’m on the topic of assessment, I’m planning to make assessment for learning my theme for this coming academic year. I would like to explore ways in which assessment can be made both more formative and more informative. Two references I have found invaluable so far for ideas are:
Thinkers – A Collection of Activities to Provoke Mathematical Thinking by John Mason et al and
Securing Their Future – Subject based assessment materials for the School Certificate by Doug Clarke et al
The former is available through AAMT and the latter was produced for the NSW Government and I’ve hotlinked the title to the pdf of the materials for you.

Both contain excellent ideas for assessing students’ understanding in ways that uncover misconceptions and lead students and their teachers to a greater understanding of both the mathematics and the underlying cognition.


About Linda

I have been involved in secondary mathematics education in Victoria, Australia for over 25 years.
This entry was posted in Assessment, Ideas for teaching & learning. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to AAMT gets political on assessment

  1. Timely post. Thanks.

    My focus this year will be on bringing my practice more in line with Doug Clarke and Charles Lovitt (in particular).

    I had a good go at it last year but will be refining and consolidating it this year.

  2. Linda says:

    Thanks for your comment, Russel. Couldn’t think of two greater role models in mathematics education than those two! We were lucky enough to secure Charles Lovitt for our faculty retreat in 2008 and he never fails to inspire. Best of luck in achieving your goals for your teaching this year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s